- Casino
- By State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Georgia
- Florida
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- By State
- Slots
- Poker
- Sports
- Esports
Fact-checked by Velimir Velichkov
Austrian Court Orders Bet-at-Home to Refund Player €2.8M
The decision comes despite the company's withdrawal from the online casino market in the country
The Supreme Court in Austria ruled in favor of a plaintiff, who filed a lawsuit against bet-at-home subsidiaries over multi-million-dollar losses. The claimant argued that they lost millions while gambling with the operator between August 2018 and July 2020. The complaint named bet-at-home.com Internet and bet-at-home.com Entertainment as defendants. The two aforementioned companies are among bet-at-home.com’s subsidiaries.
However, bet-at-home released a statement on the issue, explaining: “bet-at-home.com Internet Ltd. did not offer online gaming services as a contractual partner to the plaintiff; bet-at-home.com Entertainment Ltd. (in liquidation) was the sole contractual partner.” Moreover, the company wrote: “However, the Supreme Court assumes that bet-at-home.com Internet Ltd. is liable for gambling losses incurred in this case under tort law.”
The legal claim against bet-at-home’s subsidiaries and the recent decision of Austria’s Supreme Court comes despite the operator’s withdrawal from the online gambling market in the country a few years back. The aforementioned withdrawal was completed after a court ruling from October 2021 that recognized online gambling brands offered their services illegally in the country. This ruling reaffirmed the monopoly of the online casino market that is currently in the hands of Win2Day.
Despite the withdrawal from the online casino sector, bet-at-home continues to provide sports betting services. This is in line with Austria’s gambling regulations.
Per the Supreme Court’s latest decision, bet-at-home’s subsidiary, Betclic Everest, was ordered to pay the player a sum of €2.8 million ($3.1 million). The court acknowledged the plaintiff’s issues with gambling, explaining that they were “legally incapacitated” when engaging in online gambling activities.
It is yet to be seen how the payment will impact bet-at-home’s revenue results. Previously, the company confirmed it expects 2024 revenue in the ballpark of €45 million ($50 million) to €53 million ($58.9 million).
Player Was Ordered to Partially Return Winnings to Operator
In other related news for the region, a separate Supreme Couty ruling ordered a player to return partial winnings from unlicensed gambling. While in most cases the court orders the operator to repay losses, in this instance, the court sided with the gambling operator that sought to recover winnings paid to a player.
The Malta-based online gambling operator did not hold a license in Austria. Still, it offered its services to customers in the country. One client who deposited €22,000 ($24,000) and received a sum of nearly €29,100 ($31,800) was ordered to return part of their winnings.
While the gambling operator wanted to recover €7,152 ($7,800) from the player, the court ordered the player to return only €626.60 ($684). The latter sum is the cost for the appeal of the case and in its decision, the court explained that “every contractual partner can invoke the illegality and nullity of the contract” when it comes to illegal gambling offerings.
Related Topics:
Jerome brings a wealth of journalistic experience within the iGaming sector. His interest in the industry began after graduating from college, where he regularly participated in local poker tournaments. This exposure led him to the growing popularity of online poker and casino rooms. Jerome now channels all the knowledge he's accrued to fuel his passion for journalism, providing our team with the latest scoops online.
Must Read
Legal
February 12, 2025
Mount Airy Casino Resort Faces $5M Legal Claim
Legal
February 12, 2025
WinView Files New Patent Lawsuit Against FanDuel and DraftKings
More Articles
Industry
February 18, 2025
Indiana’s iGaming Efforts Stall as HB 1432 Fails to Make Progress
Industry
February 18, 2025
UK Gambling Firms Reportedly Avoid Publicly Disclosing Breaches
Business
February 17, 2025
FDJ Confident in Growth Despite French Tax Hike
Industry
February 17, 2025
Dutch Lawmakers Consider More Stringent Gambling Laws
Industry
February 17, 2025
Norsk Tipping Risks $3.4M Fine for Self-Exclusion Violation
Industry
February 17, 2025
Belgium Enjoys Success in Making Gamblers More Responsible
Industry
February 17, 2025
Nostalgia Attracts Players, Top Mechanics Keep Them Hooked
Industry
February 17, 2025
Breaking Down the 2025 NY Casino License Race and Bidders
Industry
February 14, 2025
Merkur Fined $120K in the UK Due to Social Responsibility Failings
Industry
February 14, 2025
H Casino in Minsk Laundered Millions from Illegal Bets, Report
Industry
February 14, 2025
Casino General Managers in Las Vegas Closer to Licensing Approval
Industry
February 13, 2025
Illegal Horse Race Betting in the UK Skyrockets 522%