- Casino
- Bitcoin Casinos
- Blacklist
- Real Money Casinos
- Reviews
- Strategy Guides
- Sweepstakes Casinos
- US Online Casinos
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Georgia
- Florida
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Slots
- Free Slots
- Ancient Slots
- Animal Slots
- Buffalo Bounty
- Chase the Turkey
- Fortune Frog
- Four Mighty Beasts
- Genesis Island
- Jungle Stripes
- Kraken Deep Wins
- Panda Playtime
- Polar Heatwave
- Purrfect Pets
- Rabbit’s Riches
- Safari Stampede
- Sea Treasures
- Shark Spin
- Stampede
- The Exterminator
- The Ingot Ox
- Tiger Temple
- Under the Sea
- Wilderness Wins
- Wolf Moon Rising
- Asian Slots
- 4 Seasons
- 15 Dragon Pearls
- Buddha Fortune Hold and Win
- Cai Hong
- Dragon & Phoenix
- Dragon Kings
- Empire of Riches
- Journey to the West
- Lucky Macau
- Make You Rich
- Moon Sisters Hold and Win
- Mr. Macau
- Mythical Creatures
- Oriental Flower
- Prosperous Bloom
- Storm Lords
- Super Rich God Hold and Win
- Thai Blossoms
- Twin Dragons
- Winds of Wealth
- Classic Slots
- Food Slots
- Gold Slots
- Horror Slots
- Jungle Slots
- Magic Slots
- Sports Slots
- Slot Developers
- Poker
- Sports
- Esports
Pace-O-Matic to Fight against “Unconstitutional Ban” of Skill Games in Kentucky
Pace-O-Matic hopes that the court will introduce an injunction that prevents House Bill 594 from banning skill games in the state
The battle between pro-skill games and anti-skill games groups in Kentucky continues. Pace-O-Matic, a Georgia-based developer of such products, teamed up with other industry bodies to file a lawsuit over House Bill 594, which would see vertical banned.
Skill games are a type of electronic terminals that offer real-money gaming. Despite their inherent similarities to slots, these machines have a skill element to them (thus the name), requiring players to react quickly and make the right decisions.
While many argue that skill games should not be put in the same category as slots, others believe that the concept is too similar and that skill games should be regulated like all other gambling terminals.
Currently, skill machines are somewhat of a gray area. Still, some want to ban them, as attested by House Bill 594. Introduced earlier this month, the measure would see skill games banned. Opponents of the vertical say that the proliferation of these machines, paired with their unregulated nature, is sure to lead to crime.
Unfortunately for the skill game industry, House Bill 594 was written into law. It will come into power 90 days from the conclusion of the General Assembly session, at which point venues offering skill games will face fines of up to $25,000 per device.
Despite the efforts to ban the machines, the skill game industry will not go down without a fight.
Pace-O-Matic Takes Matters to Court
Pace-O-Matic and several local venues that offer skill games joined forces in a lawsuit against the measure, which they believe is “unconstitutional.” Filed in Franklin Circuit Court yesterday, the lawsuit will see the provider and proponents of the vertical defend the legality of skill games in court.
Michael Barley, chief public affairs officer at Pace-O-Matic said that the industry is prepared to fight back against the unconstitutional ban. He argued that many local businesses rely on such games for income. Barley slammed the opponents of skill gaming, saying that they serve the horse racing industry’s interests and seek to monopolize entertainment in Kentucky.
Plaintiffs will try to block the measures outlined in House Bill 594, at least while the case is being heard.
Kentucky attorney general Daniel Cameron will serve as the defendant in this lawsuit and will try to ensure that the ban on skill games is not impeded. Skill games have been a controversial topic in several states for similar reasons as the ones listed above. However, banning the vertical has proven to be surprisingly hard.
Virginia, for example, introduced a law that bans skill-based machines. That law, however, was quickly squandered by an injunction issued by a local judge. Opponents of the machines could not get them banned in Pennsylvania either.
Related Topics:
Although Fiona doesn't have a long-spanning background within the gambling industry, she is an incredibly skilled journalist who has built a strong interest in the constantly growing iGaming network. The team at GamblingNews.com is glad to have her on our roster to help deliver the best stories as soon as they hit. Aside from writing, she loves to dabble in online casino games such as slots and roulette, both for her own enjoyment and also as research to better improve her understanding of the industry.
Must Read
Legal
September 27, 2024
Court Sides with Light & Wonder in Copyright Case Against Zero Gravity
Legal
September 26, 2024
Brit Sentenced to Six Years in Prison for Defrauding Thousands of Gamblers
More Articles
Casino
October 3, 2024
Caeasars Launches Horseshoe Online Casino, Exit WynnBET
Legal
October 2, 2024
Former Jaguars Employee Sues FanDuel from Prison
Industry
October 2, 2024
VGW Exits Connecticut Amid Pushback Against Sweepstakes