- Casino
- By State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Georgia
- Florida
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- By State
- Slots
- Poker
- Sports
- Esports
Fact-checked by Stoyan Todorov
Cedar Crossing Casino May Arrive in Crowded Market in Iowa
Two new studies assessing the feasibility of the proposed Cedar Crossing Casino in Iowa are optimistic about its ability to generate profit – but likely at the expense of other properties
A key focal point of any permission issued to a new casino is to ensure that it does not end up cannibalizing existing properties. The proposed Cedar Crossing Casino in Linn County may miss the mark by a wide margin after two new feasibility studies have wrestled with whether the project would be a boon to the state economy or a burden.
Cedar Crossing Casino Feasibility Studies Are Food for Thought
Touted as a worthwhile project with a huge economic impact, the Cedar Crossing Casino has every reason to be given a greenlight and a public hearing due on January 23 will further elaborate on this. However the project currently faces challenges that have to do with two independent reports by Marquette Advisors and The Innovation Group respectively.
The crux of the problem lies in the fact that the proposed Cedar Crossing Casino may end up cannibalizing the revenue of other properties. The Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission will need to decide during a February 6, 2025, hearing, with the new reports potentially throwing sand in the gears.
Marquette Advisors believes that on its own, the Cedar Crossing Casino is a project that would be drawing in $118 million in annual adjusted gaming revenue, but 60% of that result will be cut out from other Iowa casinos.
The most impacted properties will be the Riverside Casino followed by the Meskwaki Casino which could lose around $34 million and $14 million respectively should the new casino be allowed to go through.
These findings track with the figures provided by The Innovation Group, which put annual net gaming revenue at $116.5 million instead, and argued that Riverside Casino stands to lose around $16.6 million, followed by the Isle Casino in Waterloo which will also suffer $6.2 million loss.
Although the studies are not entirely confident about the exact size of the losses generated by neighboring properties, they indicate that Iowa’s land-based casino market may have reached its limits, making it difficult to decide outright if a new casino is feasible.
Do Not Give up on the Cedar Crossing Casino Just Yet
Cedar Crossing Casino, both reports determined, would mostly rely on cannibalizing existing casino footfall rather than drive in new customers or create opportunities for those who had to travel farther afield to gamble. However, it’s possible to see the casino still has a beneficial impact.
The convenience it creates could lead to an increased annual gaming revenue of $1.726 billion by 2029, up from $1.723 billion in 2024. The Cedar Crossing Casino project is aware of these challenges, however.
It has therefore chosen to contribute 8% of its net gaming revenue to various philanthropic causes, giving it a bit of a buffer for February 6. There are some short-term gains to consider, as the construction phase alone will result in 1,300 jobs and possibly bring $115.2 million in local economic benefits.
Related Topics:
Although Fiona doesn't have a long-spanning background within the gambling industry, she is an incredibly skilled journalist who has built a strong interest in the constantly growing iGaming network. The team at Gambling News is glad to have her on our roster to help deliver the best stories as soon as they hit. Aside from writing, she loves to dabble in online casino games such as slots and roulette, both for her own enjoyment and also as research to better improve her understanding of the industry.
Must Read
More Articles
Casino
January 24, 2025
Michigan Gambling Regulator Puts the Crack on MyBookie.ag
Industry
January 24, 2025
Oklahoma: Casino Murder Suspect Found Not Guilty, Released
Industry
January 24, 2025
Two Women in Caesars Palace Murder Case Go to Prison
Industry
January 23, 2025
Kirk Hendrick to Resign as Nevada Gaming Regulator Chair
Casino
January 23, 2025
Casino Workers Outraged as Boyd Gaming Updates Mask-Wearing Policy
Casino
January 23, 2025
Culinary Union Secures Contract with Virgin Hotels, Ends Strike
Slots
January 23, 2025
Elysium Studios Introduces Wild Wild North Online Slot
Sports
January 23, 2025
CFP National Championship Game Arrives to Las Vegas in 2027
Industry
January 23, 2025
Scientific Games’ Joe Bennett Steps Down from the Job
2 Comments
Not liking to drive far i dont go to any casinos but i would if Cedar Rapids got one. Also they only give to nonprofits in their counties its time Linn County has that opportunites.
The best thing that will happen is the casinos will have to compete for your business. That is great for the gambler. Riverside holds back on giving much Freeplay to Cedar Rapids gamblers as they figure they are coming there anyway. They do give a lot if freeplay if you live 90 miles away. We are already being penalized by them and they want to keep us from having a casino here. Chicago has opened up building of several casinos and the freeplay coming from them is unmatched by any of the Iowa casinos