- Casino
- By State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Georgia
- Florida
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- By State
- Slots
- Poker
- Sports
- Esports
Fact-checked by Velimir Velichkov
Washington Court Dismisses Maverick Gaming’s Sports Betting Lawsuit
The state's Third Circuit Court of Appeals reportedly dismissed the legal claim filed by the company which alleged breaches of the 10th Amendment and Indian Regulatory Gaming Act
A lawsuit filed by a gaming company that challenged the existing sports betting market established in Washington was recently dismissed.
Lawsuit Challenges Tribal-State Gaming Compacts
Washington was among the US states that legalized sports betting back in 2020. After the legalization in March 2020, legal retail sports betting launched the next year, in 2021, after Tribal casino operators implemented changes to their gaming compacts with the state. Per those compacts the Tribal operators were permitted to offer retail sports betting, in addition to their casino gambling activities.
This is precisely the issue that was flagged by one gaming company, Maverick Gaming, which filed a lawsuit. Initially, the company filed a lawsuit challenging the Tribal-state gaming compacts back in 2022. In its legal claim, Maverick Gaming alleged that the compacts violated the Indian Regulatory Gaming Act (IGRA), a law that governs gambling activities on Tribal lands, as well as the 10th Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause.
According to data from the Washington Gambling Commission, the state’s gambling regulator, currently, there are 23 federally recognized Tribes operating a total of 29 casinos under compacts with the state. In addition to class III gambling activities, the casinos offer retail sports betting and other games.
The Appeal by Maverick Gaming Was Recently Dismissed
Maverick Gaming’s lawsuit initially hit a snag after it was dismissed by the Western Washington District Court. At the time, the court explained that the Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe, which was named by the plaintiff, couldn’t join the litigation.
This is because Tribal Nations across the country have sovereign status, which means that they have a separate judicial system, law enforcement and other agencies that govern activities particularly on Tribal Land. Due to this sovereign status, Tribal operators are protected and cannot be sued in state courts.
While Maverick Gaming attempted to appeal that decision, its appeal was recently denied, Legal Sports Report reveals. Reportedly, the gaming company’s appeal was dismissed by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently. That decision effectively reaffirmed the initial court’s ruling.
Still, the battle is far from over, as Maverick Gaming may turn to a higher court for a ruling. The company’s CEO, Eric Persson, reportedly confirmed the intention to take the matter to the Supreme Court.
Even if Maverick Gaming takes the matter to the higher court, this doesn’t guarantee a win in the legal battle. In a similar case from Florida, the Supreme Court upheld a 2021 gambling compact between the state and the Seminole Tribe, putting an end to a years-long legal dispute.
Related Topics:
Jerome brings a wealth of journalistic experience within the iGaming sector. His interest in the industry began after graduating from college, where he regularly participated in local poker tournaments. This exposure led him to the growing popularity of online poker and casino rooms. Jerome now channels all the knowledge he's accrued to fuel his passion for journalism, providing our team with the latest scoops online.
Previous Article
Legal
December 18, 2024
Deutsche Bank Analyst Reflects on Louisiana Sports Betting Hearing
Next Article
Legal
December 18, 2024
FTC to Require Lodging and Ticketing Companies to Disclose Extra Fees
Must Read
Legal
January 15, 2025
Man Claims Lifelong Repercussions from Faulty Lamp in Strip Hotel
Legal
January 14, 2025
Coquille Tribe Casino Approval Sparks Legal Battle with Opponents
Legal
January 14, 2025
Operators of Illegal Casino in Flint Receive Sentences
More Articles
Business
January 20, 2025
GiG’s Sweepstakes Platform Hits the Market with Primero
Casino
January 20, 2025
Mississippi Bill Seeks to End Smoking in Casinos
Legal
January 20, 2025
Genshin Impact Dev Faces $20M FTC Fine over Loot Boxes
Legal
January 20, 2025
LV Court Dismisses $11.2M Judgment Against Trey Songz
Legal
January 20, 2025
Legal Battle Between Kalshi and CFTC Intensifies
Casino
January 20, 2025
Eklutna Tribe Works Fast on Birchwood Casino Project
Business
January 17, 2025
Kick Reaches Out to TikTok with Acquisition Offer
Industry
January 17, 2025
IGT’s Games Mint Four More Millionaires in December
Legal
January 17, 2025
Nevada Regulator Denies Paying $40K to Patrons in Casino Disputes
Legal
January 17, 2025
Fraud Case Against Concord Casino Owner Hits Snag in New Hampshire