- Casino
- By State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Georgia
- Florida
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- By State
- Slots
- Poker
- Sports
- Esports
Tribes in Texas Win Legal Fight to Hold Bingo Games
A decades-long fight over tribes’ right to have gambling in their establishments on Texan soil finally concludes in favor of the tribes. There are still a few kinks to work out, though, and it’s not complete gaming freedom.
Tiguas Win Right to Hold Bingo Games
The Tiguas, or as they’re formerly known – the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo – can now legally conduct bingo games at their Speaking Rock Entertainment Center in the Lower Valley after a 4-5 decision by the US Supreme Court made on Wednesday, concluding a decades-long legal fight to hold games in Texas.
The state of Texas is known for having some of the strictest gambling laws in the US and the Tigua Pueblo people have experienced this with losses in court that are too many to count over the years. However, a definitive decision was never reached while the fight was happening in federal courts.
Adding to the importance of this victory is the fact the Tiguas and the Alabama-Coushatta are the only two tribes in the entire country that have their gambling regulated by a state government. The 1987 Restoration Act is a sine qua non for this issue, since there is a certain amount of ambiguity about the extent of Texas’ gambling laws, thanks to a distinction in the provisions about regulation and prohibition. As per the document, tribes are banned from holding gaming activities as long as they are banned by Texan law.
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion, in which he states that “No one questions that Texas “regulates” bingo by fixing the time, place, and manner in which the game may be conducted.” As you can probably see, this means that bingo games are regulated, and not banned. Some further light is shone on the matter by Gorsuch, after explaining that Texan laws “prohibit bingo” only if the game “fails to comply with the State’s time, place, and manner regulations,” making it clear there are provisions in the law about a legal way to hold bingo games.
And that’s the basis on which the Supreme Court ruled that Tiguas can indeed hold bingo games at their establishment.
A Win for Existing Gambling, Not Expansion
This ruling of the Supreme Court doesn’t absolve the Tiguas from gaming regulation, of course. It simply means that the Tiguas – and very possibly the Alabama-Coushatta as well – are now going to be regulated by the National Indian Gaming Commission, just like all the rest of the tribes in the entire country. This means that the case will now return to the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals to remedy its wrongful understanding of the Restoration Act after having its decisions voided by this new Supreme Court ruling.
The win to hold bingo games does not automatically mean all past rulings about tribal gaming activities are voided as well. In 2016, the tribe had to switch to bingo, only after having its “sweepstakes” gaming ruled illegal, and the only reason they’ve won the case was because of careful interpretation of the original wording in the Restoration Act and Texan laws.
Furthermore, the Tiguas use electronic bingo machines, which Texas lawyers argued look and work a lot like slot machines. It’s a good thing that the Supreme Court has already addressed the last part, ruling that whether electronic bingo machines should be regarded as slot machines is “irrelevant,” since if “good governance requires a different set of rules, its appeals are better directed to those who make the laws than those charged with following them.”
Kyamil is a big tech fan, who loves hummus on everything and has enjoyed writing from a young age. From essays, through personal art, to news pieces and more serious tech analysis. In recent years he’s found fintech and gambling collide with all his interests, so he truly shares our core passion for the entire gambling scene and furthering the education of the mass citizen on these topics.
Must Read
Legal
January 15, 2025
Man Claims Lifelong Repercussions from Faulty Lamp in Strip Hotel
Legal
January 15, 2025
Intralot, VSC Settle DC Betting Fraud Probe with $6.5M Payment
Legal
January 17, 2025
Fraud Case Against Concord Casino Owner Hits Snag in New Hampshire
More Articles
Industry
January 21, 2025
RSI CIO Takes Leave from Company
Casino
January 21, 2025
MGM Grand Hotel & Casino Embarks on $300M Refurbishing Project
Business
January 20, 2025
GiG’s Sweepstakes Platform Hits the Market with Primero
Casino
January 20, 2025
Mississippi Bill Seeks to End Smoking in Casinos
Legal
January 20, 2025
Genshin Impact Dev Faces $20M FTC Fine over Loot Boxes
Industry
January 20, 2025
Thailand’s Mulled iGaming Foray Might Attract Crime Syndicates
Legal
January 20, 2025
LV Court Dismisses $11.2M Judgment Against Trey Songz
Casino
January 20, 2025
Short Circuit Sparks Devastating Fire at Casino in Mexico
Legal
January 20, 2025
Legal Battle Between Kalshi and CFTC Intensifies