- Casino
- By State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Georgia
- Florida
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- By State
- Slots
- Poker
- Sports
- Esports
NH Lottery Wins Case Against DOJ’s Wire Act Revisions Case
A Federal Circuit Court ruled against the DOJ’s revision of the Wire Act, which prohibited all types of interstate online gambling activities.
Court Disagrees with 2019 Revision of Wire Act
Interstate online gambling could once again take off after the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled Wednesday in favor of the New Hampshire Lottery Commission (NHLC) by rejecting the Department of Justice’s 2019 revision of the Federal Wire Act. The court agreed with District Court Judge Paul Barbadoro’s 60-page opinion released in June 2019 that the 1961 Wire Act is limited to interstate sports wagering.
In 2011, the DOJ interpreted the ambiguous law and limited the prohibition of interstate data transmissions to sports events, before issuing a revision of the Wire Act, dated November 2, 2018, reversing this decision in 2019, under the Trump Justice Department. The decision aimed to ban interstate internet gambling.
“We find that the plaintiffs’ claims are justiciable and that the Wire Act applies only to interstate wire communications related to sporting events or contests. Therefore, we affirm the district court’s grant of the plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment and its denial of the government’s motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment,” the court’s conclusion reads.
In 2002, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had already decided that the Wire Act was limited to interstate sports wagering.
Gambling Experts Worry
The ruling sparked hope in the online poker community, which has been particularly affected by the ban on interstate iGaming, and the online gambling sector.
But industry experts and analysts said the First Circuit’s decision on Inauguration Day could do more harm than good to online gambling activities since the Biden administration would have reverted back to the DOJ’s 2011 Wire Act revision. According to gambling specialist and attorney Daniel Wallach, the new administration will not take further action on the matter and the ruling made Wednesday hindered a decision of greater positive impact on the online gambling sector. The government was ordered to pay appeal costs to the NHLC.
The status quo remains on sports betting, but the new administration is not expected to take the case to the US Supreme Court, as Joe Biden was Vice President when the 2011 revision was voted.
Mathilde has been writing for over 5 years, with 3 of those years as a specialist in the iGaming industry covering headlines across the world. With her honed research and reporting expertise, Mathilde has solidified her position as a regular author for Gambling News. Outside of work, she enjoys studying sculpture which is one of her other strong passions.
Next Article
Legal
January 22, 2021
ESIC Issues Bans to 35 Australians Involved in Esports Match-Fixing
Must Read
Legal
March 13, 2025
Minnesota Judge Rules in Favor of Tribal Casinos in Lawsuit
Legal
March 14, 2025
UK: Accidental Document Release Disrupts Lottery Litigation
Legal
March 14, 2025
UK Gambling Commission Cracks Down on Illegal Betting Ring
More Articles
Industry
March 18, 2025
Underdog Exits New York amid Regulatory Scrutiny
Legal
March 18, 2025
Man Arrested for Exchanging Counterfeit Money at PA Casino
Sports
March 18, 2025
2025 Straight Talk Wireless 400 Odds, Time, and Prediction