March 10, 2025 2 min read

likes:

Fact-checked by Angel Hristov

Connecticut Considers Joining MISGA, Mulls over Max Size for Online Bets

The measure was referred to the Senate’s Joint Committee on General Law on Thursday

A new bill in Connecticut seeks to align the state with the requirements for joining the Multi-State Internet Gaming Agreement (MISGA) for online poker.  The measure could, among other things, also set a limit on the maximum sum players can wager on a single online sports bet.

A Limit on Betting

As outlined in Senate Bill 01464, the Connecticut House General Law Committee could potentially introduce a maximum sum players can spend on a single online sports bet. The measure was referred to the Senate’s Joint Committee on General Law on Thursday.

If passed, the bill would require the Commissioner of Consumer Protection to adopt new online sports betting regulations, setting up a maximum amount of money consumers can place on a single online wager.

As of the time of this writing, there is no information as to what the potential maximum amount players can bet would be.

Connecticut Wants to Join the MISGA

Although SB 01464 could change how players interact with online sportsbooks, its main goal is to fulfill certain MISGA requirements, potentially allowing the Constitution State to join the agreement.

MISGA member states, for context, can host online poker games where players can compete against opponents in different member states. This enriches the online poker sector and fosters a broader online community.

To allow Connecticut to join the MISGA, SB 01464 would include wording defining online poker as a peer-to-peer casino game where players can compete against one another and not against the dealer. Under this wording, the licensee hosting poker games, contests or tournaments is responsible for assessing fees associated with the games.

Additionally, the bill contains wording that would allow the governor to sign a deal with states or territories to “authorize online gaming operators to conduct multijurisdictional Internet gaming for peer-to-peer casino games,” as long as they align with state and federal laws and are conducted in MISGA player states.

For context, the MISGA currently boasts the following members:

  • Delaware
  • Michigan
  • Nevada
  • New Jersey
  • Pennsylvania
  • West Virginia

Problem Gambling Hotline, Refunds Are on the Table

Meanwhile, SB 01464 would also establish a toll-free hotline that bettors can call when they require assistance with their gambling.

Last but not least, licensees who discover irregularities with the odds on an event should stop taking wagers until the problem has been corrected and potentially provide refunds.

Journalist

Although Fiona doesn't have a long-spanning background within the gambling industry, she is an incredibly skilled journalist who has built a strong interest in the constantly growing iGaming network. The team at Gambling News is glad to have her on our roster to help deliver the best stories as soon as they hit. Aside from writing, she loves to dabble in online casino games such as slots and roulette, both for her own enjoyment and also as research to better improve her understanding of the industry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *