- Casino
- By State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Georgia
- Florida
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- By State
- Slots
- Poker
- Sports
- Esports
Fact-checked by Angel Hristov
Cherokee Nation Tries to Dismiss Gulfside’s Lawsuit in Arkansas
The Arkansas Racing Commission previously handed the sole gaming license for Pope County to Cherokee Nation Entertainment
The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma continues to experience setbacks in Arkansas as a lawsuit seeks to challenge its receiving of a casino license in the state. In an effort to secure its license, the tribal entity’s Cherokee Nation Businesses (CNB) and Cherokee Nation Entertainment asked a federal court to dismiss the lawsuit.
Gulfside Alleges Authorities Were Playing Favorites
The Arkansas Racing Commission previously handed the sole gaming license for Pope County to Cherokee Nation Entertainment. However, the commission didn’t consider Gulfside Casino Partnership’s proposal because its application didn’t come with letter of support from Pope County Judge Ben Cross or support from the Pope County Quorum Court.
Gulfside, however, disagreed with this dismissal and took legal action against the nation, the commission, Cross and the court. The operator alleges that the authorities favored the Cherokee application and used “coercive tactics” to make it qualify for the license.
Attorneys representing the Cherokee nation, however, asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit. They argued that Cross has, since stepping into the office in January 2019, listened to the proposals of multiple applicants. According to them, he has decided to exclusively support CNB and has been consistent with that decision.
Judge Cross, the dismissal motion further says, believes that CNB’s proposal would provide the most significant benefits to Pope County. For context, the Cherokee Nation plans to construct a $300 million casino in Russellville. Gulfside, on the other hand, envisioned a $405 million project in the city.
The Battle Continues
Cross recently finalized the EDA agreement and the Pope County Quorum Court issued a resolution to support the Cherokee Nation casino plans. While the court considered issuing another support resolution for the Gulfside plan but only five of its members were supportive of the company’s proposal.
Gulfside’s lawsuit alleges that the court purposefully prevented its project from being reviewed, although Cherokee attorneys noted that the operator contradicts its statements from an earlier lawsuit. They added that Arkansas law “does not allow Gulfside to take such inconsistent position in litigation.”
The Pope County casino property was greenlit by players in 2018. Since then, Gulfside and the Cherokee nation have been embroiled in a long-drawn legal conflict. Depending on how things unfold, the ongoing lawsuit could potentially rescind the concession.
Related Topics:
Although Fiona doesn't have a long-spanning background within the gambling industry, she is an incredibly skilled journalist who has built a strong interest in the constantly growing iGaming network. The team at Gambling News is glad to have her on our roster to help deliver the best stories as soon as they hit. Aside from writing, she loves to dabble in online casino games such as slots and roulette, both for her own enjoyment and also as research to better improve her understanding of the industry.
Must Read
Legal
January 13, 2025
Trial Date Set for Wrongful Death, Negligence Lawsuit Against Wynn
Legal
January 15, 2025
Man Claims Lifelong Repercussions from Faulty Lamp in Strip Hotel
Legal
January 14, 2025
Coquille Tribe Casino Approval Sparks Legal Battle with Opponents
More Articles
Legal
January 17, 2025
Spreadex Appeals CMA’s Order to Divest Sporting Index
Business
January 17, 2025
Kick Reaches Out to TikTok with Acquisition Offer
Industry
January 17, 2025
IGT’s Games Mint Four More Millionaires in December
Legal
January 17, 2025
Nevada Regulator Denies Paying $40K to Patrons in Casino Disputes
Legal
January 17, 2025
Fraud Case Against Concord Casino Owner Hits Snag in New Hampshire
Industry
January 17, 2025
NCPG Executive Director Keith Whyte Withdraws from the Job
Legal
January 17, 2025
California: Court Asks Card Rooms to Supply Surveillance Footage
Industry
January 16, 2025
SPGA Praises New Jersey Bill That Would Regulate Sweepstakes
Legal
January 16, 2025
Former Philippine Mayor Alice Guo Faces Money Laundering Charges
Sports
January 16, 2025
ALT Sports Data to Offer Regulated X Games Wagering Products
Business
January 16, 2025
Bally’s Wants Huge Property Tax Cut for Chicago Casino & Resort
2 Comments
We need the legal battles over. All the other Casinos are up and running bringing in Revenue. IT’S time to stop the BS and get it built
I would not go to gulfshore if they were to receive it. The wsy the have been and all the trouble they have caused. They wouldn’t msje it here.