- Casino
- By State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Georgia
- Florida
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- By State
- Slots
- Poker
- Sports
- Esports
Fact-checked by Angel Hristov
Unhappy Client Takes DraftKings to Court over Data-Sharing Violation
While DraftKings’ privacy policy makes it clear that some crucial third-party products, services and materials might be integrated into its business, the plaintiff argued that in this case, the tools were not essential to the operator’s business
A DraftKings client has filed a lawsuit against the company, alleging that the American operator committed severe data violations. According to the plaintiff, the gambling company unlawfully provided data regarding his behavior on social media to Facebook.
DraftKings Transferred Data Without Its Customers’ Consent
According to the class action, which was filed on Friday in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, DraftKings leveraged Facebook’s tracking tools, which allowed the Meta-owned social media company to collect data about sports bettors’ viewing habits and the games they had interest in wagering on. The complaint says that DraftKings effectively transmitted all data of its players’ watched videos and purchases to Facebook.
Plaintiff Jeffrey Wan’s legal representatives emphasized that he had never agreed to have his information distributed to third parties, such as Facebook. As a result, he alleged that DraftKings’ actions have violated the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA).
The tools that DraftKings allegedly used included Facebook Pixel and Conversions API. The former, according to the complaint, was used to track, record and send Facebook its customers’ granular Website and Apps activity and the names of pieces of audio-visual media that customers viewed. Wan’s legal team argued that this is more than metadata.
While DraftKings’ privacy policy makes it clear that some crucial third-party products, services and materials might be integrated into its business, the plaintiff argued that in this case, the tools were not essential to the operator’s business. Even if they were, Wan’s legal team added, they could have been used in a less intrusive way.
The lawsuit concluded that the plaintiff and the class members had not consented to having their video-viewing data transmitted to third parties without their knowledge.
DraftKings Faces a Separate Lawsuit
In the meantime, an affected other recently filed another lawsuit against the betting operator, alleging that the gambling company had taken significant amounts of money from her husband who was suffering from gambling addiction.
The complaint said that the man had lost almost $1 million of the family savings on bets because of his problem. The man has apparently been affected by a worsening problem gambling condition for several years, causing him to wager more than he could afford.
Instead of following its own safer gambling rules, DraftKings allegedly incentivized the man to keep on playing.
Related Topics:
Angel has a passion for all forms of writing, be it fiction or nonfiction. His curious nature gives him an ace up his sleeve when researching a new topic. Angel’s thirst for knowledge, paired with adaptability, always helps him find his way around.
Previous Article
Legal
December 17, 2024
Children in the UK Exposed to Illegal Gambling via Robux Casinos
Next Article
Legal
December 17, 2024
Jefferies Equity Analyst Prepares Investors for Entain AML Fine
Must Read
Legal
January 9, 2025
DraftKings Takes Heat Over “Free Bet” Promotional Language
Legal
January 9, 2025
Chinese Actor Saved from Scam Center in Myanmar
More Articles
Casino
January 14, 2025
Indiana Introduces Bill to Relocate Rising Sun Casino to New Haven
Industry
January 14, 2025
Esportes da Sorte Gains Nationwide Authorization in Brazil
Industry
January 14, 2025
Churchill Downs Takes MGCB to Court over TwinSpires Suspension
Industry
January 14, 2025
Charitable Gambling Requirements Under Review in North Dakota
Legal
January 14, 2025
Operators of Illegal Casino in Flint Receive Sentences
Industry
January 14, 2025
Betting Scheme Linked to Jontay Porter Results in Another Arrest
Casino
January 14, 2025
Adin Ross Gives Away $8,000 – $20,000 to Random Couple in Casino
Sports
January 14, 2025
FanDuel Donates $250K to Help with LA Wildfire Relief Efforts
Legal
January 14, 2025
Coquille Tribe Casino Approval Sparks Legal Battle with Opponents
Sports
January 14, 2025
ESPN Bet Readies to Launch Online in Washington, DC
Industry
January 14, 2025
Crypto.com’s Football Contracts Face CFTC Scrutiny
Casino
January 14, 2025
Judge Gives Green Light to Koi Nation Casino Project Near Windsor
Business
January 14, 2025
Donald Trump Jr. Becomes Kalshi’s Strategic Adviser