- Home
- Prediction Markets
- Eyes on Minnesota: CFTC Ramps Up Battle Over Prediction Markets
Eyes on Minnesota: CFTC Ramps Up Battle Over Prediction Markets
- The CFTC is now reportedly monitoring Minnesota after new legislation targeting prediction markets advanced
- Federal regulators have already challenged actions in five states, including Arizona and New York
- Industry observers believe the growing legal battle could eventually reach the US Supreme Court
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has decided to show more determination in its battle against state regulators regarding the way controversial prediction markets should be tackled, legislation-wise.
The commission’s next target is Minnesota, as explained by CFTC chair Michael Selig. Members will begin to closely monitor the North Star State as a result of advancing legislation seeking to regulate as well as ban some prediction markets, says Semafor.
At the end of April, Minnesota became the latest US state to try to impose a ban on prediction markets, to the dismay of the CFTC. The decision followed a controversial statement by Kalshi that said that a local lawmaker had relied on event contract apps to make predictions regarding his personal political race.
Sixth on the List
As of now, the CFTC boss has filed five lawsuits against five US states that have attempted to limit prediction markets. The list of states includes Connecticut, Arizona, New York, Illinois, and Wisconsin.
Earlier this week, Selig proceeded to praise the decision of a district judge to block Arizona’s legal action against prediction market operator Kalshi, explaining that it reiterated the idea according to which the federal regulator had full rights to regulate prediction markets.
Selig has also witnessed other court wins. Just last month, a New Jersey-based court of appeals took Kashi’s side and, prior to that, Tennessee was flipped over by a judge’s decision that offered Kalshi a preliminary injunction.
Supreme Court Expected to Intervene
Industry voices are now keeping a close eye on the Supreme Court and its future actions: will it take the matter into its hands and rule who should have ultimate power in regulating prediction markets?
Currently, the CFTC is responsible for regulating prediction markets, which are allowed to operate in all 50 states. Nonetheless, critics do not agree with this approach, arguing that it gives these platforms an inherent advantage when compared to traditional sportsbooks.
Plus, this also allows prediction market operators to enter markets that do not currently feature legal sports betting frameworks.
Melanie specializes in analyzing legalities and the ongoing development of land-based gaming infrastructure. She tracks zoning regulations, casino expansions, and the legislative hurdles of resort development. Her sharp insights guide operators through the complex permitting processes required to build tomorrow’s premier brick-and-mortar gaming destinations.