- Casino
- By State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Georgia
- Florida
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- By State
- Slots
- Poker
- Sports
- Esports
Fact-checked by Velimir Velichkov
Nevada: Casino Patrons Claims over $900K Winnings Denied
Two casino patrons who filed disputes in Nevada saw their claims rejected by the Nevada Gaming Control Board
Disputes between casino operators and visitors related to payouts, unpaid jackpots or malfunctioning machines or other games are often brought to the attention of the gambling regulator. In Nevada’s case, such disputes are overseen by the Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB). Recently, the NGCB rejected two disputes for nearly $1 million in winnings, filed by gamblers in Las Vegas and Reno.
Resorts World Las Vegas Poker Win Stays $250K
One of the cases involves a Texas Hold’em win at Resorts World Las Vegas, while the other one is related to a slot machine win at the Grand Sierra Resort and Casino, as announced by CDC Gaming. The two disputes involve a sum of more than $900,000 in winnings.
When it comes to the Texas Hold’em win, a patron argued that they had to be paid $500,000 instead of the $250,000 they won while playing at Resorts World Las Vegas. Reviewing the case, NGCB’s member, George Assad, sided with the casino, saying that the patron was indeed due to receive $250,000 and not $500,000.
Explaining his decision, Assad pointed to the win which was an aggregate amount in the game. He outlined that while the odds of placing a $1,000 bet would have awarded the player $500,000, the win was a total aggregate amount.
“I think he (the patron) misunderstood that when they say total aggregate amount, that’s the total amount you’re going to get paid, regardless of how much you bet.“
George Assad, member of the NGCB
Assad added that it is likely that the player didn’t understand that condition which effectively means that the total awarded amount would be $250,000, regardless of the size of the wager. This otherwise means that the patron’s dispute was rejected.
Another Patron Dispute Was Rejected
The second case revolved around a $678,587 slot machine win at the Grand Sierra Resort and Casino in Reno. Reviewing the case, the NGCB heard Assad explain that while the slot’s random number generator operated “properly,” the machine itself didn’t tilt, and the winnings shouldn’t be paid out.
In other words, the second patron dispute was also rejected by the NGCB. The denial of the two requests seeking over $900,000 recognizes that the gamblers do not have a right to receive those winnings.
In an effort to reduce the number of disputes filed by gamblers who won jackpots, in September, a proposal called to prohibit banned gamblers from receiving such prizes. This effort seeks to help casinos stand their ground and have the right not to pay jackpots to gamblers who aren’t allowed on gaming floors across the state.
Related Topics:
Jerome is a welcome new addition to the Gambling News team, bringing years of journalistic experience within the iGaming sector. His interest in the industry begun after he graduated from college where he played in regular local poker tournaments which eventually lead to exposure towards the growing popularity of online poker and casino rooms. Jerome now puts all the knowledge he's accrued to fuel his passion for journalism, providing our team with the latest scoops online.
Previous Article
Industry
November 7, 2024
Bally's Q3 2024 Shows Slight Revenue Drop, Yet Strong Market Position Remains
Must Read
Industry
December 4, 2024
The Dutch Regulator Warns Operators over Illegal Bets
Industry
December 6, 2024
UKGC Offers Updated Evaluation of the Gambling Act Review
More Articles
Legal
December 11, 2024
BetMGM Faces Third Circuit Appeal in Negligence Suit by Problem Gambler
Industry
December 10, 2024
Polymarket Releases Betting on UnitedHealthcare CEO Killer’s Arrest
Business
December 10, 2024
Underdog’s Peer-to-Peer Shift Enabled Business Growth
Legal
December 10, 2024
CFTC’s Tensions with Kalshi Escalate amid Legal Battle
Business
December 10, 2024
BetMGM Names Ex-Fiat Chrysler Head Hurbis as New CMO
Casino
December 10, 2024
Player Wins $3M Slot Jackpot at Seminole Hard Rock Casino Hollywood
Industry
December 10, 2024
Pizza Hut Slammed for “Free Spins” Campaign
Industry
December 10, 2024
Pennsylvania Stood at the Top in Terms of 2023 Casino Taxes
Industry
December 10, 2024
Las Vegas Sands Donates $15M for Chinese Institute at UNLV
Industry
December 10, 2024
New Jersey’s DGE Imposes Fines Against William Hill, Amelco
Legal
December 10, 2024
Churchill Downs and NYRA File Lawsuit Against HISA Over Fee Dispute
Industry
December 10, 2024
Sweepstakes Continue to Expand amid Intensifying Oversight
Industry
December 9, 2024
US Virgin Islands Take Pivotal Step in Gambling Harm Prevention
Lottery
December 9, 2024
Mega Millions Jackpot Soars to $619M for Next Drawing