- Casino
- By State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Georgia
- Florida
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- By State
- Slots
- Poker
- Sports
- Esports
Fact-checked by Velimir Velichkov
Nevada: Casino Patrons Claims over $900K Winnings Denied
Two casino patrons who filed disputes in Nevada saw their claims rejected by the Nevada Gaming Control Board

Disputes between casino operators and visitors related to payouts, unpaid jackpots or malfunctioning machines or other games are often brought to the attention of the gambling regulator. In Nevada’s case, such disputes are overseen by the Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB). Recently, the NGCB rejected two disputes for nearly $1 million in winnings, filed by gamblers in Las Vegas and Reno.
Resorts World Las Vegas Poker Win Stays $250K
One of the cases involves a Texas Hold’em win at Resorts World Las Vegas, while the other one is related to a slot machine win at the Grand Sierra Resort and Casino, as announced by CDC Gaming. The two disputes involve a sum of more than $900,000 in winnings.
When it comes to the Texas Hold’em win, a patron argued that they had to be paid $500,000 instead of the $250,000 they won while playing at Resorts World Las Vegas. Reviewing the case, NGCB’s member, George Assad, sided with the casino, saying that the patron was indeed due to receive $250,000 and not $500,000.
Explaining his decision, Assad pointed to the win which was an aggregate amount in the game. He outlined that while the odds of placing a $1,000 bet would have awarded the player $500,000, the win was a total aggregate amount.
“I think he (the patron) misunderstood that when they say total aggregate amount, that’s the total amount you’re going to get paid, regardless of how much you bet.“
George Assad, member of the NGCB
Assad added that it is likely that the player didn’t understand that condition which effectively means that the total awarded amount would be $250,000, regardless of the size of the wager. This otherwise means that the patron’s dispute was rejected.
Another Patron Dispute Was Rejected
The second case revolved around a $678,587 slot machine win at the Grand Sierra Resort and Casino in Reno. Reviewing the case, the NGCB heard Assad explain that while the slot’s random number generator operated “properly,” the machine itself didn’t tilt, and the winnings shouldn’t be paid out.
In other words, the second patron dispute was also rejected by the NGCB. The denial of the two requests seeking over $900,000 recognizes that the gamblers do not have a right to receive those winnings.
In an effort to reduce the number of disputes filed by gamblers who won jackpots, in September, a proposal called to prohibit banned gamblers from receiving such prizes. This effort seeks to help casinos stand their ground and have the right not to pay jackpots to gamblers who aren’t allowed on gaming floors across the state.
Related Topics:
Jerome brings a wealth of journalistic experience within the iGaming sector. His interest in the industry began after graduating from college, where he regularly participated in local poker tournaments. This exposure led him to the growing popularity of online poker and casino rooms. Jerome now channels all the knowledge he's accrued to fuel his passion for journalism, providing our team with the latest scoops online.
Previous Article
Industry
November 7, 2024
Bally's Q3 2024 Shows Slight Revenue Drop, Yet Strong Market Position Remains
Must Read
Industry
September 12, 2025
Animo Launches Next-Gen Live Gaming with Animated Hosts on Stake
Industry
September 12, 2025
California Continues to Advance AB 831, SGLA Expresses Frustration
More Articles
Industry
September 18, 2025
Canadians Less Likely than Americans to Bet on Sports, Study Shows
Lottery
September 18, 2025
Norsk Tipping Faces $1M Fine After Eurojackpot Error
Industry
September 18, 2025
German Watchdog Says Just 1 in 12 Gambling Sites Are Legal
Industry
September 18, 2025
UKGC Publishes the First of Several Illegal Online Gambling Reports
Casino
September 18, 2025
Italy to Launch Ambitious Anti-Gambling Firewall
Casino
September 18, 2025
Romanian Regulator Shutters Two Illegal Sites
Casino
September 18, 2025
Wynn UAE Casino to Feature Crypto Payments & More
Poker
September 18, 2025
Kalshi Secures Daniel Negreanu as Its New Brand Ambassador
Casino
September 18, 2025
Poker Palace in North Las Vegas to Open Its Doors Again in 2026
Casino
September 18, 2025
Gang Who Posed as Detectives Locked Up for Recovery Scam
Casino
September 18, 2025
Times Square Casino Plan Falls Through Due to Broadway Opposition
Casino
September 18, 2025
Tourist in Las Vegas Shot by a Security Guard Armed Without Authorization
Casino
September 18, 2025
Ex-Gregg Township Official Jailed for $533K Gambling Embezzlement