Big Lagoon Rancheria Asks to Hold Off on AB 831

The Big Lagoon Rancheria has asked California lawmakers to hold off on Assembly Bill 831, saying the proposed law puts tribal sovereignty at risk and might hurt smaller tribes’ chances to make money. They made this request in an August 25 letter to the Senate Appropriations Committee, which Tribal Chairperson Virgil Moorehead signed.

Big Lagoon Rancheria Warns of Economic and Sovereignty Risks

The tribe stressed that its appeal does not outright oppose regulating sweepstakes-style gaming. Instead, it calls to consult all affected tribes properly. Leaders argue that the bill, which started as a small technical tweak to compact law, changed a lot in the Senate without tribal governments’ input. The new version now suggests banning many forms of online gaming.

Moorehead pointed out that this one-sided action goes against promises to consult government-to-government and hurts trust between the state and tribal nations. He also cautioned that the bill’s wide-ranging wording could make not just operators but also service providers who support online platforms liable. This could extend the state’s reach into Indian Country in ways that might break federal law.

Financial worries play a big part in this argument. Small and country-based tribes, many without big brick-and-mortar casinos, have turned to online businesses to make money for key services like healthcare, homes, and schools. Tribal leaders say AB 831 would stop these opportunities without offering other options or looking at how much money tribes might lose from such a ban.

Big Lagoon Rancheria and Kletsel Authority Push for Balanced Sweepstakes Rules

The Big Lagoon Rancheria and the Kletsel Economic Development Authority are sounding the alarm about this bill. Both groups point out that no one has looked into good alternatives yet, such as rules that protect customers but also help tribes make money.

During a recent Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, several organizations and stakeholders spoke out against the measure, with no one testifying in favor. Critics, including industry spokespersons, pointed out that regulating and taxing sweepstakes gaming could bring in substantial state revenue estimated to range from $200 million to $300 million each year.The committee plans to look at the measure again later this week, and both those for and against it are getting ready to share their views. Leaders from Big Lagoon insist that a careful, inclusive approach is crucial to create laws that protect consumers while also respecting the rights and financial stability of California’s tribal communities.