- Casino
- By State
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Georgia
- Florida
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- By State
- Slots
- Poker
- Sports
- Esports
Fact-checked by Angel Hristov
Arkansas Casino Referendum Spending Tops $30M
The high-stakes battle over the Pope County casino license rages on, with both sides spending significant sums to tip the scales in their favor

With more than $30 million raised by rival casino interests, the high-dollar proxy war over a constitutional amendment has become one of the costliest political battles in recent Arkansas history as voters in Pope County prepare to go to the polls. The stakes couldn’t be higher for groups on both sides as the referendum could reshape Arkansas’ gambling landscape.
Both Sides Have Vested Financial Interests
The dispute concerns a constitutional amendment proposed by Local Voters in Charge, a political action committee (PAC) backed by the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma. If approved, the proposal would invalidate a casino license in Pope County awarded to Cherokee Nation Entertainment (CNE) of the Cherokee Nation and mandate a countywide referendum for any future casino developments in the state.
Local Voters in Charge argues the decision should ultimately be up to the local communities whether or not to have a casino in their backyard. On the opposing side, two other PACs – Investing in Arkansas and the Arkansas Canvassing Compliance Committee – emphasize the potential economic benefits of the proposed casino, with promises of jobs, local investment, and increased tax revenue for Pope County.
The Arkansas Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in shaping the debate over the referendum. After a lengthy legal battle, the court ruled last month that the amendment’s name and ballot title were acceptable, allowing it to appear on the November ballot. The decision has sparked a public showdown between Cherokee and Choctaw supporters, with each side spending millions on ads to sway public sentiment.
Rising Spending Highlights the Vote’s Importance
According to a recent Arkansas Times report, Local Voters in Charge reported a substantial fundraising increase this month, raising $8.9 million and bringing its total to $17.7 million. The group has already spent $15.6 million on campaign advertisements and grassroots initiatives, leaving it with roughly $2 million to use before the upcoming vote.
Meanwhile, Investing in Arkansas and its associated PACs have collectively raised over $13 million to fight the amendment. The organizations have flooded local TV and radio stations with ads supporting Pope County’s current casino license. They argue the casino license should not get revoked because it would hamper the region’s economic development, causing a loss for the county and the entire state.
With campaign finance deadlines fast approaching, both sides keep pouring funds into their respective campaigns, highlighting their determination to influence voter sentiment. Regardless of the outcome, this battle has reshaped the landscape of Arkansas politics and revealed how outside entities can influence local politics as they pursue their financial interests. The stakes are high as the final vote will set a precedent for future casino developments.
Related Topics:
Deyan is an experienced writer, analyst, and seeker of forbidden lore. He has approximate knowledge about many things, which he is always willing to apply when researching and preparing his articles. With a degree in Copy-editing and Proofreading, Deyan is able to ensure that his work writing for Gambling News is always up to scratch.
Next Article
Industry
November 4, 2024
Dutch Regulator Reprimands Operators over Sponsorship Violations
Must Read
Industry
August 28, 2025
Usman Khawaja Urges Ban on Gambling Ads in Sport
More Articles
Industry
September 2, 2025
KSA Strikes Unibet with Weekly Fines Due to Repeated Offences
Business
September 2, 2025
Pine Sports and SharpSports Merge to Reach Greater Heights
Casino
September 2, 2025
Criminal Boss “Fat Mike” Denied Compassionate Release from Prison
Industry
September 2, 2025
Crypto.com to Power Underdog’s Prediction Markets Foray
Industry
September 2, 2025
Kazakhstan Could Criminalize Influencers Promoting Gambling Content
Slots
September 2, 2025
Discover the Riches of a Molten Jungle in Play’n GO’s Fire Toad 2
Industry
September 2, 2025
California Inches Closer to Banning Sweepstakes as AB 831 Advances
Casino
September 2, 2025
55% of Filipino Gamblers, Unaware of Risks Tied to Illegal Sites
Sports
September 2, 2025
Diego Lopes vs. Jean Silva Noche UFC 3 Odds, Time, and Prediction
Casino
September 2, 2025
Billionaire Sues Star Sydney Over $57M Gambling Loss
Industry
September 2, 2025
UK Launches New Anti-Fraud Rules Impacting Betting Firms